<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 4 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24918</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on the applicability of section 43A for increased liability due to currency fluctuations. However, the court directed a re-examination regarding depreciation and extra shift allowance on storage tanks and bore-wells. The treatment of notional expenditure on depreciation, repairs, and property tax was partially upheld. Expenses incurred on the issue of right shares were deemed capital expenditure. House rent and car allowance were not considered perquisites. Premium paid for personal accident insurance of employees was not treated as perquisites. Expenses on tea, coffee, etc., supplied to employees were found to be deductible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 4 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24918</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on the applicability of section 43A for increased liability due to currency fluctuations. However, the court directed a re-examination regarding depreciation and extra shift allowance on storage tanks and bore-wells. The treatment of notional expenditure on depreciation, repairs, and property tax was partially upheld. Expenses incurred on the issue of right shares were deemed capital expenditure. House rent and car allowance were not considered perquisites. Premium paid for personal accident insurance of employees was not treated as perquisites. Expenses on tea, coffee, etc., supplied to employees were found to be deductible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>