<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 659 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405331</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that penalty cannot be imposed on income assessed based on estimation. Ad hoc estimations do not constitute concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, citing precedents where penalties were not applicable when income was determined through estimation without concrete evidence of concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 659 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405331</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that penalty cannot be imposed on income assessed based on estimation. Ad hoc estimations do not constitute concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, citing precedents where penalties were not applicable when income was determined through estimation without concrete evidence of concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>