<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 649 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405321</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that the Assessing Officer, conducting limited scrutiny as per CBDT Instructions, cannot go beyond the specified reasons for selection. The assessment order complied with the governing instructions, and the PCIT cannot deem the order erroneous for not examining other aspects outside the limited scrutiny scope. Consequently, the revision order under section 263 was quashed as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 649 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405321</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that the Assessing Officer, conducting limited scrutiny as per CBDT Instructions, cannot go beyond the specified reasons for selection. The assessment order complied with the governing instructions, and the PCIT cannot deem the order erroneous for not examining other aspects outside the limited scrutiny scope. Consequently, the revision order under section 263 was quashed as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>