<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 637 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405309</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 06.01.2021 by the learned CMM, New Delhi, granting permission to the respondent to travel abroad. Emphasizing the importance of reasoned judicial orders and compliance with judicial comity, the Court criticized the lack of transparency and diligence in the case. The matter was referred to the Bar Council of India and the Inspecting Committee of Judges for further action regarding the conduct of the counsels and the learned Trial Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 637 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405309</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 06.01.2021 by the learned CMM, New Delhi, granting permission to the respondent to travel abroad. Emphasizing the importance of reasoned judicial orders and compliance with judicial comity, the Court criticized the lack of transparency and diligence in the case. The matter was referred to the Bar Council of India and the Inspecting Committee of Judges for further action regarding the conduct of the counsels and the learned Trial Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>