https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405309 An order permitting a respondent to travel abroad was set aside because the application before the trial court concealed that the High Court had already refused the same request in the same matter. The omission was treated as deliberate and material, and the trial court granted permission without ascertaining the earlier High Court proceedings, despite reference to that order in the application. The court held that this reflected non-application of mind and disregard of judicial hierarchy, so the permission to travel abroad could not stand. en-us Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jan 2022 15:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405309 An order permitting a respondent to travel abroad was set aside because the application before the trial court concealed that the High Court had already refused the same request in the same matter. The omission was treated as deliberate and material, and the trial court granted permission without ascertaining the earlier High Court proceedings, despite reference to that order in the application. The court held that this reflected non-application of mind and disregard of judicial hierarchy, so the permission to travel abroad could not stand. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405309