<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 632 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405304</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance to 6.75% of bogus purchases, based on judicial precedents and business nature. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s orders for multiple assessment years, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the disallowance percentages set by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:10:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 632 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405304</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance to 6.75% of bogus purchases, based on judicial precedents and business nature. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s orders for multiple assessment years, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the disallowance percentages set by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>