<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 626 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405298</link>
    <description>Section 7 insolvency proceedings were treated as maintainable where the RBI directions flowed from the Central Government&#039;s notification under section 35-AA of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The tribunal record indicated that the corporate debtor&#039;s account was included in the specific list referred for resolution, and the later communication dated 28.8.2017 was treated as a direction tied to identified defaults rather than a general instruction outside the statutory framework. On that basis, the objection that Central Government authorisation was lacking failed, and the dismissal of the section 7 petition was found unsustainable; the connected review appeal also became infructuous once the main order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:10:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 626 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405298</link>
      <description>Section 7 insolvency proceedings were treated as maintainable where the RBI directions flowed from the Central Government&#039;s notification under section 35-AA of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The tribunal record indicated that the corporate debtor&#039;s account was included in the specific list referred for resolution, and the later communication dated 28.8.2017 was treated as a direction tied to identified defaults rather than a general instruction outside the statutory framework. On that basis, the objection that Central Government authorisation was lacking failed, and the dismissal of the section 7 petition was found unsustainable; the connected review appeal also became infructuous once the main order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>