<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1865 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294032</link>
    <description>CBDT&#039;s monetary limit for departmental appeals before the ITAT was applied to test maintainability, with limited exceptions carved out by the circular. The tax effect in each appeal was below the prescribed threshold and no stated exception applied, so the Revenue&#039;s appeals were held not maintainable and dismissed. Liberty was reserved to the Revenue to seek recall if any appeal had been wrongly included or was covered by an exception.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1865 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294032</link>
      <description>CBDT&#039;s monetary limit for departmental appeals before the ITAT was applied to test maintainability, with limited exceptions carved out by the circular. The tax effect in each appeal was below the prescribed threshold and no stated exception applied, so the Revenue&#039;s appeals were held not maintainable and dismissed. Liberty was reserved to the Revenue to seek recall if any appeal had been wrongly included or was covered by an exception.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>