<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24904</link>
    <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1969-70, ruling that the defective show-cause notice did not deprive the assessee of a fair opportunity to defend. The Court emphasized the importance of addressing all contentions during appeals to prevent delays and urged timely and comprehensive decision-making by appellate authorities to avoid hardships and maintain efficiency in the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:20:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24904</link>
      <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1969-70, ruling that the defective show-cause notice did not deprive the assessee of a fair opportunity to defend. The Court emphasized the importance of addressing all contentions during appeals to prevent delays and urged timely and comprehensive decision-making by appellate authorities to avoid hardships and maintain efficiency in the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>