https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405284 The Supreme Court ruled that applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act were time-barred as per the Limitation Act, with the limitation period starting from the claimant's right to require arbitration. The Court found the Respondent's claims were time-barred, originating from actions in 2003 and 2010. It concluded that the High Court erred in appointing an arbitrator due to the time-barred claims. The appeals were allowed, overturning the High Court's judgment as the applications were deemed hopelessly time-barred. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405284 The Supreme Court ruled that applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act were time-barred as per the Limitation Act, with the limitation period starting from the claimant's right to require arbitration. The Court found the Respondent's claims were time-barred, originating from actions in 2003 and 2010. It concluded that the High Court erred in appointing an arbitrator due to the time-barred claims. The appeals were allowed, overturning the High Court's judgment as the applications were deemed hopelessly time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405284