https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405279 The court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging the rejection of the VAT refund application, emphasizing the availability of a statutory remedy under Section 72 of the Jammu & Kashmir Value Added Tax Act, 2005. It directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy before resorting to extraordinary writ jurisdiction, highlighting the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. The court advised the appellate authority to consider any delay liberally, particularly in the context of the post-Covid-19 situation. en-us Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:46:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405279 The court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging the rejection of the VAT refund application, emphasizing the availability of a statutory remedy under Section 72 of the Jammu & Kashmir Value Added Tax Act, 2005. It directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy before resorting to extraordinary writ jurisdiction, highlighting the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. The court advised the appellate authority to consider any delay liberally, particularly in the context of the post-Covid-19 situation. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405279