<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 606 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405278</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition without imposing costs. The authority accepted the petitioner&#039;s submissions, leading to the dropping of adjudication proceedings, as evidenced by Order-in-Original No.79469 of 2021 issued on 08.02.2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:46:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 606 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405278</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition without imposing costs. The authority accepted the petitioner&#039;s submissions, leading to the dropping of adjudication proceedings, as evidenced by Order-in-Original No.79469 of 2021 issued on 08.02.2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>