<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 601 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405273</link>
    <description>The court issued an interim order staying the recovery of service tax on royalty, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s stance in a similar case. However, it did not grant interim relief concerning the levy of CGST and JGST, permitting revenue authorities to proceed with assessment. Respondents were instructed to submit counter-affidavits within three weeks, with petitioners given two weeks to reply. The case is set for further hearing in the week of April 26, 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 601 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405273</link>
      <description>The court issued an interim order staying the recovery of service tax on royalty, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s stance in a similar case. However, it did not grant interim relief concerning the levy of CGST and JGST, permitting revenue authorities to proceed with assessment. Respondents were instructed to submit counter-affidavits within three weeks, with petitioners given two weeks to reply. The case is set for further hearing in the week of April 26, 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>