<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 599 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405271</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, confirming that the transactions were within the framework of law and not colorable devices. The appeal was dismissed, with all substantial questions of law answered against the revenue and in favor of the assessee. The legitimacy and validity of the transactions, along with the non-existence of liability, were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 599 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405271</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, confirming that the transactions were within the framework of law and not colorable devices. The appeal was dismissed, with all substantial questions of law answered against the revenue and in favor of the assessee. The legitimacy and validity of the transactions, along with the non-existence of liability, were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>