<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 589 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 48,07,109/- on commission expenses, finding the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of payments. Despite procedural errors in citing sections, the assessment order was deemed valid under Section 292B. The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance by the assessee, affirming the disallowance and emphasizing the burden of proof on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 589 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 48,07,109/- on commission expenses, finding the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of payments. Despite procedural errors in citing sections, the assessment order was deemed valid under Section 292B. The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance by the assessee, affirming the disallowance and emphasizing the burden of proof on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>