<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 579 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , SPECIAL BENCH, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application, setting aside the RP&#039;s decision to include DSKL in the list of PRAs. The Tribunal held that the list of PRAs prepared by the former RP on 6th March 2020 was valid and accepted. The Tribunal emphasized that the RP and the Committee of Creditors (CoC) must adhere to the procedures prescribed under the IBC and the CIRP Regulations to ensure a fair and unbiased resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 579 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , SPECIAL BENCH, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application, setting aside the RP&#039;s decision to include DSKL in the list of PRAs. The Tribunal held that the list of PRAs prepared by the former RP on 6th March 2020 was valid and accepted. The Tribunal emphasized that the RP and the Committee of Creditors (CoC) must adhere to the procedures prescribed under the IBC and the CIRP Regulations to ensure a fair and unbiased resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>