<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1460 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294020</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the appellant were allowed as the judgment settled the classification issue in favor of the appellant based on the Tribunal&#039;s previous classification under CTH 72169100. The impugned order issued by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) was found to have no merit, leading to the appellant being granted consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1460 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294020</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the appellant were allowed as the judgment settled the classification issue in favor of the appellant based on the Tribunal&#039;s previous classification under CTH 72169100. The impugned order issued by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) was found to have no merit, leading to the appellant being granted consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>