<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 32 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24897</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing the importance of timely and fair assessment processes. It upheld the validity of the draft assessment order served through affixture and supported the Commissioner&#039;s authority to order a fresh assessment, ensuring proper opportunities for the assessee. The judgment highlighted the need for tax authorities to adhere to legal requirements in serving documents and avoid delaying assessments until the last minute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:05:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 32 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24897</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing the importance of timely and fair assessment processes. It upheld the validity of the draft assessment order served through affixture and supported the Commissioner&#039;s authority to order a fresh assessment, ensuring proper opportunities for the assessee. The judgment highlighted the need for tax authorities to adhere to legal requirements in serving documents and avoid delaying assessments until the last minute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>