<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1353 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294016</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Civil Court&#039;s jurisdiction is impliedly barred in employment termination disputes falling under the Industrial Disputes Act. It ruled that the Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal is the appropriate forum for resolving such matters. The Court dismissed the appeals, advising the workmen to seek redressal from the industrial forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2021 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1353 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294016</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Civil Court&#039;s jurisdiction is impliedly barred in employment termination disputes falling under the Industrial Disputes Act. It ruled that the Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal is the appropriate forum for resolving such matters. The Court dismissed the appeals, advising the workmen to seek redressal from the industrial forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>