https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294015 A writ petition under Article 226 was not the proper forum for a dispute over bonus or ex-gratia payable to employees of a public sector establishment where the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provided a specific statutory remedy. Because the controversy involved disputed questions of fact and was treated as an industrial dispute under the statutory scheme, the parties were required to pursue the prescribed machinery rather than invoke writ jurisdiction in the ordinary course. Owing to the long lapse of time, the matter was directed to be referred to the appropriate Tribunal. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:11:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294015 A writ petition under Article 226 was not the proper forum for a dispute over bonus or ex-gratia payable to employees of a public sector establishment where the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provided a specific statutory remedy. Because the controversy involved disputed questions of fact and was treated as an industrial dispute under the statutory scheme, the parties were required to pursue the prescribed machinery rather than invoke writ jurisdiction in the ordinary course. Owing to the long lapse of time, the matter was directed to be referred to the appropriate Tribunal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294015