<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1010 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was reinstated as the Tribunal found that the assessee deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars to conceal income, differing from previous judicial precedents cited. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was justified, dismissing the cross-objection of the assessee as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1010 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was reinstated as the Tribunal found that the assessee deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars to conceal income, differing from previous judicial precedents cited. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was justified, dismissing the cross-objection of the assessee as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>