<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 559 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405231</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, partially overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, granting the refund for the contested input services used in providing exported IT services. It emphasized that eligibility should focus on the actual use of input services for output services. The tribunal relied on legal precedents and CBEC clarification, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund for specific input services, excluding Health Club and Outdoor Catering.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 559 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405231</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, partially overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, granting the refund for the contested input services used in providing exported IT services. It emphasized that eligibility should focus on the actual use of input services for output services. The tribunal relied on legal precedents and CBEC clarification, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund for specific input services, excluding Health Club and Outdoor Catering.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>