<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 15 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24887</link>
    <description>Where municipal house tax is made a first charge on immovable property by statute, recovery of arrears is governed by Article 62 of the Limitation Act, 1963 as enforcement of money charged upon immovable property; the residuary Article 113 does not apply because the claim is not an unsecured money demand. The result was that the demand for arrears was not barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 15 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24887</link>
      <description>Where municipal house tax is made a first charge on immovable property by statute, recovery of arrears is governed by Article 62 of the Limitation Act, 1963 as enforcement of money charged upon immovable property; the residuary Article 113 does not apply because the claim is not an unsecured money demand. The result was that the demand for arrears was not barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>