<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 547 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405219</link>
    <description>Medicines, surgical items, implants, consumables, allied items, food and room rent supplied to in-patients were treated as naturally bundled with diagnosis, treatment, nursing care and other hospital services, so the inpatient package was a composite supply with health care service as the principal supply and was exempt from GST. Occupational health check-up services, ambulance facility and allied medical services supplied to business entities for employees were held to be different from diagnosis or treatment of a patient; because they were provided for corporate purposes rather than as health care to a patient, they did not fall within the exemption and were taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 547 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405219</link>
      <description>Medicines, surgical items, implants, consumables, allied items, food and room rent supplied to in-patients were treated as naturally bundled with diagnosis, treatment, nursing care and other hospital services, so the inpatient package was a composite supply with health care service as the principal supply and was exempt from GST. Occupational health check-up services, ambulance facility and allied medical services supplied to business entities for employees were held to be different from diagnosis or treatment of a patient; because they were provided for corporate purposes rather than as health care to a patient, they did not fall within the exemption and were taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>