https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24885 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the recovery proceedings through auction of the house were valid as notices and assessment orders were served on the receiver, who was authorized to handle the firm's affairs. The court found the petitioner and co-partners were aware of the assessment proceedings and house attachment since 1969 but did not challenge the assessment orders promptly. It held that the receiver was legally competent to receive the notices and orders, denying the relief sought and dismissing the petition without costs. en-us Mon, 07 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:25:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24885 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the recovery proceedings through auction of the house were valid as notices and assessment orders were served on the receiver, who was authorized to handle the firm's affairs. The court found the petitioner and co-partners were aware of the assessment proceedings and house attachment since 1969 but did not challenge the assessment orders promptly. It held that the receiver was legally competent to receive the notices and orders, denying the relief sought and dismissing the petition without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 07 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24885