<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 525 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405197</link>
    <description>Addition of alleged suppressed taxable turnover could not be sustained where the prescribed authority accepted the books of account, conducted no independent enquiry, and produced no material showing that the iron ore shortage represented actual unrecorded sales. Transit and handling loss during transport of iron ore fines and lumps was treated as inevitable, and the levy under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was applied to sale, not mere removal or shortage. An order passed under a different enactment with a distinct point of levy could not, by itself, justify taxation of turnover under the Act. The assessee&#039;s transit and handling loss claim was accepted as reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 525 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405197</link>
      <description>Addition of alleged suppressed taxable turnover could not be sustained where the prescribed authority accepted the books of account, conducted no independent enquiry, and produced no material showing that the iron ore shortage represented actual unrecorded sales. Transit and handling loss during transport of iron ore fines and lumps was treated as inevitable, and the levy under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was applied to sale, not mere removal or shortage. An order passed under a different enactment with a distinct point of levy could not, by itself, justify taxation of turnover under the Act. The assessee&#039;s transit and handling loss claim was accepted as reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>