https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405186 The Bench rejected the appeal for restoration of the company's name in the Register maintained by the Registrar of Companies, Mumbai. The company's failure to comply with statutory requirements and lack of active business operations led to the upheld decision of striking off the name. The Bench emphasized the importance of regulatory compliance and justified the Registrar's action, concluding that there were no justifiable grounds to interfere with the striking off. en-us Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:40:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405186 The Bench rejected the appeal for restoration of the company's name in the Register maintained by the Registrar of Companies, Mumbai. The company's failure to comply with statutory requirements and lack of active business operations led to the upheld decision of striking off the name. The Bench emphasized the importance of regulatory compliance and justified the Registrar's action, concluding that there were no justifiable grounds to interfere with the striking off. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405186