<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 511 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, determining that the transactions involving shares of Landmark Leisure Ltd. were genuine and not speculative. Consequently, the loss incurred was deemed allowable. Furthermore, the Tribunal quashed the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) as the quantum addition was deleted, rendering the penalty order ineffective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:40:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 511 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, determining that the transactions involving shares of Landmark Leisure Ltd. were genuine and not speculative. Consequently, the loss incurred was deemed allowable. Furthermore, the Tribunal quashed the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) as the quantum addition was deleted, rendering the penalty order ineffective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>