https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293988 A transfer direction requiring two matters to be tried by the same court did not, by itself, require a joint trial or common recording of evidence. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and a police case under Section 420 of the IPC involve different ingredients and procedures, and the earlier order could not be read as compelling sequencing of evidence in one case before the other. Section 210 of the CrPC was not shown to mandate the relief sought on these facts, so the rejection of the application was upheld. en-us Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:39:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293988 A transfer direction requiring two matters to be tried by the same court did not, by itself, require a joint trial or common recording of evidence. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and a police case under Section 420 of the IPC involve different ingredients and procedures, and the earlier order could not be read as compelling sequencing of evidence in one case before the other. Section 210 of the CrPC was not shown to mandate the relief sought on these facts, so the rejection of the application was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293988