https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293988 The High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the trial court's decision to proceed with the cross-examination in SCC No. 589 of 2010 before completing the examination-in-chief in RCC No. 39 of 2014. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments for a joint trial, emphasizing the distinct nature of the offenses under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The court found no merit in applying Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and stressed the importance of avoiding further delays in the proceedings, directing an expeditious trial. en-us Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:39:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293988 The High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the trial court's decision to proceed with the cross-examination in SCC No. 589 of 2010 before completing the examination-in-chief in RCC No. 39 of 2014. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments for a joint trial, emphasizing the distinct nature of the offenses under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The court found no merit in applying Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and stressed the importance of avoiding further delays in the proceedings, directing an expeditious trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293988