<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1459 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293983</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition under Section 7 of the IBC, ruling in favor of the corporate debtor. The financial creditor failed to adequately prove the debt against the debtor due to missing details and discrepancies in the documents submitted. The debtor presented a strong defense, including legal proceedings and financial records, casting doubt on the creditor&#039;s claim of default. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence in insolvency cases and concluded that the creditor&#039;s evidence was insufficient and unreliable, highlighting the debtor&#039;s solvency and rejecting the petition to initiate CIRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1459 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293983</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition under Section 7 of the IBC, ruling in favor of the corporate debtor. The financial creditor failed to adequately prove the debt against the debtor due to missing details and discrepancies in the documents submitted. The debtor presented a strong defense, including legal proceedings and financial records, casting doubt on the creditor&#039;s claim of default. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence in insolvency cases and concluded that the creditor&#039;s evidence was insufficient and unreliable, highlighting the debtor&#039;s solvency and rejecting the petition to initiate CIRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>