<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court of Karnataka Rules NCLT Lacked Authority in Mining Lease Extension Case Against State Government.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57135</link>
    <description>NCLT did not have jurisdiction to entertain an application against the Government of Karnataka for a direction to execute Supplemental Lease Deeds for the extension of the mining lease. Since NCLT chose to exercise a jurisdiction not vested in it in law, the High Court of Karnataka was justified in entertaining the writ petition, on the basis that NCLT was coram non judice - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:41:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:41:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court of Karnataka Rules NCLT Lacked Authority in Mining Lease Extension Case Against State Government.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57135</link>
      <description>NCLT did not have jurisdiction to entertain an application against the Government of Karnataka for a direction to execute Supplemental Lease Deeds for the extension of the mining lease. Since NCLT chose to exercise a jurisdiction not vested in it in law, the High Court of Karnataka was justified in entertaining the writ petition, on the basis that NCLT was coram non judice - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:41:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>