<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 988 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293972</link>
    <description>Under Section 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965, consent to sub-let must be shown by a positive and unambiguous act of the landlord. Mere silence, inaction, prior knowledge of sub-letting, or acceptance of rent does not amount to implied consent or waiver. On the evidence, no clear contractual right to sub-let was established and the inference of consent was rejected. The result was that unauthorised sub-letting remained a valid ground for eviction, and the eviction order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:16:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 988 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293972</link>
      <description>Under Section 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965, consent to sub-let must be shown by a positive and unambiguous act of the landlord. Mere silence, inaction, prior knowledge of sub-letting, or acceptance of rent does not amount to implied consent or waiver. On the evidence, no clear contractual right to sub-let was established and the inference of consent was rejected. The result was that unauthorised sub-letting remained a valid ground for eviction, and the eviction order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>