<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 493 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405165</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Tax Case Appeals filed by the Revenue. The court determined that internet expenditure should be excluded from both export turnover and total turnover under Section 10A of the IT Act. This interpretation aligns with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, ensuring fair deductions and calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 493 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405165</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Tax Case Appeals filed by the Revenue. The court determined that internet expenditure should be excluded from both export turnover and total turnover under Section 10A of the IT Act. This interpretation aligns with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, ensuring fair deductions and calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>