<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 488 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405160</link>
    <description>In tax classification disputes, entitlement to a concessional rate must be supported by examination of the product&#039;s nature and relevant materials, and not by invoices or claimed HSN classification alone. A brief order that does not address the material aspects bearing on the applicable rate of tax is inadequate and calls for reconsideration. The common order was therefore set aside, and the matters were remitted to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 488 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405160</link>
      <description>In tax classification disputes, entitlement to a concessional rate must be supported by examination of the product&#039;s nature and relevant materials, and not by invoices or claimed HSN classification alone. A brief order that does not address the material aspects bearing on the applicable rate of tax is inadequate and calls for reconsideration. The common order was therefore set aside, and the matters were remitted to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>