https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405157 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is ordinarily not available against a private bank that is not shown to be discharging a public duty under Article 12. Where the dispute arises from measures taken under the SARFAESI framework, the Act's complete statutory mechanism, including remedies before the Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal, must ordinarily be pursued first. The availability of an efficacious alternative remedy applies with greater force in such matters, and writ interference is generally declined. On the facts noted, the petition was found not maintainable and dismissed. en-us Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405157 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is ordinarily not available against a private bank that is not shown to be discharging a public duty under Article 12. Where the dispute arises from measures taken under the SARFAESI framework, the Act's complete statutory mechanism, including remedies before the Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal, must ordinarily be pursued first. The availability of an efficacious alternative remedy applies with greater force in such matters, and writ interference is generally declined. On the facts noted, the petition was found not maintainable and dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405157