<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 484 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405156</link>
    <description>The Writ Petition against a Private Limited Company was deemed not maintainable by the High Court as the company did not meet the criteria of a Government Company or instrumentality of the State. The termination of the petitioner&#039;s contractual appointment was found valid as per the terms outlined in the appointment letter. The Court emphasized that no formal enquiry was required for the removal order in the absence of the company being an instrumentality of the State. Allegations preceding the termination did not exempt the company from contractual obligations. The Writ Petition was dismissed, with costs awarded to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:39:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 484 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405156</link>
      <description>The Writ Petition against a Private Limited Company was deemed not maintainable by the High Court as the company did not meet the criteria of a Government Company or instrumentality of the State. The termination of the petitioner&#039;s contractual appointment was found valid as per the terms outlined in the appointment letter. The Court emphasized that no formal enquiry was required for the removal order in the absence of the company being an instrumentality of the State. Allegations preceding the termination did not exempt the company from contractual obligations. The Writ Petition was dismissed, with costs awarded to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>