<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 481 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405153</link>
    <description>Suspension of a customs broker licence was not interfered with where the licensing regime provided for a post-decisional hearing and the broker did not attend that hearing. The Tribunal treated the non-appearance as a serious lapse and held that there was no valid ground to intervene at that stage, especially because the statutory process still contemplated a further hearing before the authority. It also directed supply of relevant documents and expeditious completion of the hearing process, with the broker required to participate before the licensing authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 481 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405153</link>
      <description>Suspension of a customs broker licence was not interfered with where the licensing regime provided for a post-decisional hearing and the broker did not attend that hearing. The Tribunal treated the non-appearance as a serious lapse and held that there was no valid ground to intervene at that stage, especially because the statutory process still contemplated a further hearing before the authority. It also directed supply of relevant documents and expeditious completion of the hearing process, with the broker required to participate before the licensing authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>