https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405137 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the arrangement of experts on secondment did not constitute the parent company supplying manpower to the appellant. Therefore, no service tax was payable under Reverse Charge Mechanism. The decision also addressed the issues of limitation and penalty, ultimately setting aside the demand, interest, and penalty imposed by the Commissioner. en-us Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405137 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the arrangement of experts on secondment did not constitute the parent company supplying manpower to the appellant. Therefore, no service tax was payable under Reverse Charge Mechanism. The decision also addressed the issues of limitation and penalty, ultimately setting aside the demand, interest, and penalty imposed by the Commissioner. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405137