<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 461 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405133</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority ordered the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, Amrit Feeds Limited, due to the absence of any Resolution Plan during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Committee of Creditors approved the appointment of Mr. Pratim Bayal as the Liquidator, but objections were raised by the suspended board of directors. Despite the majority vote by the CoC, the appointment process was found to have procedural errors, leading to the appointment of Mr. Sunil Mohan Acharya as the Liquidator. The judgment emphasized compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and clarified the role of the CoC in such appointments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:37:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 461 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405133</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority ordered the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, Amrit Feeds Limited, due to the absence of any Resolution Plan during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Committee of Creditors approved the appointment of Mr. Pratim Bayal as the Liquidator, but objections were raised by the suspended board of directors. Despite the majority vote by the CoC, the appointment process was found to have procedural errors, leading to the appointment of Mr. Sunil Mohan Acharya as the Liquidator. The judgment emphasized compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and clarified the role of the CoC in such appointments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>