<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 457 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405129</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant cannot be penalized for non-disclosure as the income was voluntarily declared in the revised return without prior notice under section 148. The ITAT emphasized that taxes were paid with interest, and the revised return was not in response to a notice. Consequently, the ITAT directed the AO to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:37:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 457 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405129</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant cannot be penalized for non-disclosure as the income was voluntarily declared in the revised return without prior notice under section 148. The ITAT emphasized that taxes were paid with interest, and the revised return was not in response to a notice. Consequently, the ITAT directed the AO to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>