<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1866 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293966</link>
    <description>The HC directed the respondents to hold the impugned Income Tax orders in abeyance until the NCLT proceedings conclude. The Court highlighted the protective nature of the Moratorium under the IBC, shielding the petitioners from coercive actions during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Writ Petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1866 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293966</link>
      <description>The HC directed the respondents to hold the impugned Income Tax orders in abeyance until the NCLT proceedings conclude. The Court highlighted the protective nature of the Moratorium under the IBC, shielding the petitioners from coercive actions during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Writ Petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>