<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 703 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293958</link>
    <description>The court allowed petitioners representing depositors to oversee transactions at the 6th respondent&#039;s office every Saturday afternoon as per the settlement agreement. Police were directed to intervene only if necessary, ensuring law and order. The writ petition seeking police protection was disposed of following the agreement for amicable settlement and repayment by respondents 6 and 7.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 703 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293958</link>
      <description>The court allowed petitioners representing depositors to oversee transactions at the 6th respondent&#039;s office every Saturday afternoon as per the settlement agreement. Police were directed to intervene only if necessary, ensuring law and order. The writ petition seeking police protection was disposed of following the agreement for amicable settlement and repayment by respondents 6 and 7.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>