<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 14 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24869</link>
    <description>The reference application concerned whether three tax questions should be sent to the High Court, including whether payment to field organisers constituted genuine business expenditure and whether disallowance under section 40A(5) was referable. Question No. 2 was treated as already concluded by the Supreme Court decision, so no reference was directed on that issue. Questions Nos. 1 and 3 were directed to be referred by the Tribunal to the High Court for decision, and the application was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:16:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 14 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24869</link>
      <description>The reference application concerned whether three tax questions should be sent to the High Court, including whether payment to field organisers constituted genuine business expenditure and whether disallowance under section 40A(5) was referable. Question No. 2 was treated as already concluded by the Supreme Court decision, so no reference was directed on that issue. Questions Nos. 1 and 3 were directed to be referred by the Tribunal to the High Court for decision, and the application was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>