https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57118 Appointment of members of CESTST - petitioner, Govt, contends that CAT did not consider (a) sub-section (7) added to Section 129 of the Customs Act 1962 (Customs Act), vide the same Finance Act 2017 and which Section 129(7) - contention of the counsel for the respondents is that if the respondents, under the impugned order of CAT were to be given the benefit of the 2017 Rules - Section 129(7) of the Customs Act having admittedly not been noticed by CAT in the impugned order, the same is per incuriam to that extent and cannot be sustained - HC en-us Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:48:17 +0530 Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:48:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57118 Appointment of members of CESTST - petitioner, Govt, contends that CAT did not consider (a) sub-section (7) added to Section 129 of the Customs Act 1962 (Customs Act), vide the same Finance Act 2017 and which Section 129(7) - contention of the counsel for the respondents is that if the respondents, under the impugned order of CAT were to be given the benefit of the 2017 Rules - Section 129(7) of the Customs Act having admittedly not been noticed by CAT in the impugned order, the same is per incuriam to that extent and cannot be sustained - HC Highlights Customs Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:48:17 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57118