https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405119 Section 11 applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are governed by the residual limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, because the Act prescribes no separate limitation period and Section 43 imports the Limitation Act. Time starts when the other party fails to appoint an arbitrator after a valid invocation notice and expiry of the stipulated appointment period. At the referral stage, the court ordinarily limits scrutiny to the existence of an arbitration agreement, but may refuse reference in rare cases where the claims are manifestly dead, ex facie time-barred, and no subsisting dispute remains. en-us Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 May 2022 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405119 Section 11 applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are governed by the residual limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, because the Act prescribes no separate limitation period and Section 43 imports the Limitation Act. Time starts when the other party fails to appoint an arbitrator after a valid invocation notice and expiry of the stipulated appointment period. At the referral stage, the court ordinarily limits scrutiny to the existence of an arbitration agreement, but may refuse reference in rare cases where the claims are manifestly dead, ex facie time-barred, and no subsisting dispute remains. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405119