<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 443 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405115</link>
    <description>The HC directed respondent No.2 to implement the detention cum demurrage waiver certificates and release the imported goods within 15 days. It mandated the continuation and conclusion of the investigation into the petitioner&#039;s complaint within three months. The court refrained from awarding costs against customs authorities, acknowledging their prompt actions post-order. The writ petition was allowed to the extent of the specified directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 443 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405115</link>
      <description>The HC directed respondent No.2 to implement the detention cum demurrage waiver certificates and release the imported goods within 15 days. It mandated the continuation and conclusion of the investigation into the petitioner&#039;s complaint within three months. The court refrained from awarding costs against customs authorities, acknowledging their prompt actions post-order. The writ petition was allowed to the extent of the specified directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>