https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405113 The High Court directed Mr. Ravi Prakash to file an affidavit explaining the legal basis for collecting amounts from the petitioner-company without proper notices or orders. A deadline of one week was set for filing the affidavit, with a subsequent hearing scheduled. Coercive actions against the petitioner-company were stayed during this period, allowing the respondents to continue their investigation. The judgment aimed to ensure transparency and fairness in the collection process, providing an opportunity for clarification and legal arguments before any further steps were taken. en-us Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405113 The High Court directed Mr. Ravi Prakash to file an affidavit explaining the legal basis for collecting amounts from the petitioner-company without proper notices or orders. A deadline of one week was set for filing the affidavit, with a subsequent hearing scheduled. Coercive actions against the petitioner-company were stayed during this period, allowing the respondents to continue their investigation. The judgment aimed to ensure transparency and fairness in the collection process, providing an opportunity for clarification and legal arguments before any further steps were taken. Case-Laws GST Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405113