https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405110 The High Court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's order regarding salary disparity between pre and post-2017 appointees of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court held that pre-2017 appointees should be governed by the 1987 Rules, not the 2017 Rules, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions over principles like equal pay for equal work. The Court highlighted the importance of a comprehensive analysis of all terms and conditions before applying such principles, ultimately allowing the petition and emphasizing the need to consider statutory provisions in such matters. en-us Wed, 03 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:17:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405110 The High Court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's order regarding salary disparity between pre and post-2017 appointees of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court held that pre-2017 appointees should be governed by the 1987 Rules, not the 2017 Rules, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions over principles like equal pay for equal work. The Court highlighted the importance of a comprehensive analysis of all terms and conditions before applying such principles, ultimately allowing the petition and emphasizing the need to consider statutory provisions in such matters. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 03 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405110