<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 423 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405095</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) set aside the Order-in-Appeal denying waiver of penal charges for late filing of the Bill-of-Entry, ruling in favor of the appellant. Citing legal precedents, the Member found the impugned order unsustainable, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s justified actions as a subsequent consignee. The decision granted relief to the appellant, highlighting the significance of assessing factual circumstances in determining penal charges for late filings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:16:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 423 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405095</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) set aside the Order-in-Appeal denying waiver of penal charges for late filing of the Bill-of-Entry, ruling in favor of the appellant. Citing legal precedents, the Member found the impugned order unsustainable, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s justified actions as a subsequent consignee. The decision granted relief to the appellant, highlighting the significance of assessing factual circumstances in determining penal charges for late filings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>