<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 416 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for AY 2010-11, upholding the disallowance of the deduction due to the lack of approval during the relevant previous year. However, for AY 2011-12, the Tribunal allowed the deduction, recognizing that the R&amp;amp;D facility was approved within the relevant year, aligning with judicial precedents that the date of approval is not the cut-off date for eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 416 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for AY 2010-11, upholding the disallowance of the deduction due to the lack of approval during the relevant previous year. However, for AY 2011-12, the Tribunal allowed the deduction, recognizing that the R&amp;amp;D facility was approved within the relevant year, aligning with judicial precedents that the date of approval is not the cut-off date for eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>