https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405076 The Tribunal set aside the imposition of 2.47% countervailing duty (CVD) on the appellant due to the incorrect computation of subsidy for the "other program," which brought the subsidy margin below the de minimis level. The issue of classifying drawn Copper Wire as Continuous Cast Copper Wire Rods was deemed unnecessary to examine in light of the first issue. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the imposition of CVD on the appellant as per the final judgment. en-us Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:14:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405076 The Tribunal set aside the imposition of 2.47% countervailing duty (CVD) on the appellant due to the incorrect computation of subsidy for the "other program," which brought the subsidy margin below the de minimis level. The issue of classifying drawn Copper Wire as Continuous Cast Copper Wire Rods was deemed unnecessary to examine in light of the first issue. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the imposition of CVD on the appellant as per the final judgment. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405076